Introduction

Choosing the right human resources information system (HRIS) tool is crucial for any business aiming to manage its workforce efficiently. In this comparison, we'll examine UKG Pro and Lano to help you determine which may best suit your organizational needs.

​

UKG Pro is a cloud-based human capital management (HCM) solution designed for midsize and large organizations to manage employee pay and various HR functions. Lano, on the other hand, is a cloud-based compliance and payments platform that offers a unified solution for hiring, managing, and paying employees and contractors across over 150 countries, without requiring a legal entity setup.

​

Comparing these two HRIS tools is essential for businesses to identify the best fit for their operational objectives, ensuring a streamlined approach to human resource management, compliance, and global payments.

​

UKG Pro Overview

Key Features

UKG Pro comes with a comprehensive suite of features aimed at improving the management of human capital in midsize to large organizations. Key features include:

​

• Payroll Management: Automates payroll processes, ensuring timely and accurate payment of employees.
• Talent Management: Facilitates recruitment, onboarding, performance management, and succession planning.
• Workforce Management: Offers tools for scheduling, time and attendance tracking, and labor cost management.
• HR Service Delivery: Enhances employee engagement through self-service portals and case management.
• Reporting and Analytics: Provides in-depth insights with customizable reports and dashboards.
• Compliance Tools: Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements with real-time updates and compliance management tools.
• Mobile Access: Allows employees and managers to access information and perform HR-related tasks from mobile devices.
• Learning and Development: Supports employee training and development initiatives with e-learning modules.

​

Lano Overview

Key Features

Lano specializes in providing a unified platform for managing global teams with a strong focus on compliance and payroll. Key features include:

​

• Global Payroll: Simplifies payroll processing for employees and contractors in over 150 countries.
• Compliance Management: Ensures compliance with local labor laws and regulations, reducing legal risks.
• Hiring and Onboarding: Streamlines the hiring process and accelerates onboarding with automated workflows.
• Contractor Management: Manages freelancers and contractors, including contract creation and payment scheduling.
• Payments Platform: Offers secure and timely payments in multiple currencies.
• Workforce Management: Tracks time and attendance, project management, and productivity metrics.
• Employee Self-Service: Provides an intuitive interface for employees to manage their profiles, documents, and requests.
• Data Security: Ensures the protection of sensitive data with robust security measures.

​

Similarities

Both UKG Pro and Lano offer robust HRIS capabilities designed to simplify workforce management and enhance organizational efficiency. Similarities include:

​

• Cloud-Based Solutions: Both platforms are cloud-based, ensuring accessibility and scalability.
• Payroll Management: They provide comprehensive payroll management to ensure accurate and timely payments.
• Compliance Tools: Both tools offer robust compliance management features to adhere to local and global regulations.
• Employee Self-Service: Employees can access their profiles, manage requests, and complete HR tasks via self-service portals.
• Analytics and Reporting: They offer analytics and reporting functionalities for data-driven decision-making.
• Mobile Access: Both tools provide mobile apps for accessing and managing HR information on the go.
• Workforce Management: Features to track time, attendance, and productivity are available in both platforms.

​

Differences

Despite the similarities, there are key differences between UKG Pro and Lano that cater to different organizational needs:

​

• Target Audience: UKG Pro is designed for midsize to large organizations, while Lano focuses on businesses managing global remote teams, including contractors and freelancers.
• Geographical Focus: Lano excels in managing international workforce compliance and payments, whereas UKG Pro is more suitable for companies with a primarily US-based workforce.
• Core Features: UKG Pro offers a broader set of HCM features including talent management and learning and development, whereas Lano specializes in global payroll, compliance, and contractor management.
• Compliance Management: Lano has a stronger emphasis on international compliance, especially for companies operating in multiple countries without legal entities.
• User Experience: Lano focuses more on simplifying contractor management and payments, whereas UKG Pro prioritizes a comprehensive HCM solution inclusive of employee service delivery and talent management.

​

Pros and Cons

UKG Pro

• Pros:
• Comprehensive HCM suite including payroll, talent management, and workforce management.
• Strong HR service delivery capabilities with self-service portals.
• Advanced analytics and reporting features for data-driven insights.
• Support for learning and development initiatives.
• Mobile access for convenient management on the go.
• Cons:
• Higher complexity may require extensive training and onboarding.
• Best suited for midsize to large organizations, which may be overkill for smaller businesses.
• Limited focus on international compliance compared to Lano.

​

Lano

• Pros:
• Strong emphasis on managing global compliance and payroll for contractors and employees.
• Simplifies hiring and onboarding for international teams.
• Secure global payments in multiple currencies.
• Robust contractor management features.
• Easy-to-use interface and self-service options.
• Cons:
• More specialized for companies operating in multiple countries.
• Smaller feature set compared to UKG Pro's comprehensive HCM offerings.
• May not fully meet the needs of large organizations looking for an all-encompassing HCM solution.

​

Use Cases

• UKG Pro:
• Ideal for midsize to large organizations that need a comprehensive HCM solution.
• Suitable for companies that require robust payroll, talent management, and learning and development tools.
• Great for businesses looking to enhance employee engagement through self-service portals and HR service delivery.

​

• Lano:
• Ideal for companies managing a global workforce, including contractors and freelancers.
• Suitable for businesses needing strong compliance management in multiple countries.
• Great for organizations seeking to simplify global payroll and secure payments in various currencies.

​

Conclusion

In comparing UKG Pro and Lano, it's clear that both HRIS tools excel in different areas, catering to specific organizational needs. UKG Pro offers a comprehensive HCM suite ideal for midsize to large businesses requiring extensive HR capabilities. Lano, however, shines in managing global teams, focusing on compliance and payroll for international contractors and employees.

​

Choosing the right tool depends on your organizational priorities. If you're looking for an all-in-one HCM solution with advanced talent management and learning features, UKG Pro is the way to go. On the other hand, if you need robust global compliance and payment management for a diverse and international workforce, Lano is the better fit.