Introduction

Bitbucket is the Git solution for professional teams. It provides collaboration and code management around the versioning of your codebase. Every piece of core functionality has been built to help software teams work better together. This ranges from collaboration to integrations & extensibility, security, and scalability. 

​

Bitbucket allows software teams to collaborate around their source code, secure their code base, enforce development workflows, and scale as their team grows. It integrates with JIRA Software for traceability from feature ideation through deployment. Bitbucket provides a platform for developers to discuss code changes, a window into development progress for development managers, and a performant version control system for system admins.

​

Considering alternatives can help some organizations find an even better fit for their specific needs, whether they are looking for different features, interfaces, or integrations.

​

Alternative 1: GitHub

GitHub is a leading platform for developers to host, review, and share their code. It has a vast community and offers a broad array of tools and services to enhance software development.

​

Key features

• Version control: Advanced Git version control with powerful branching and merging.
• Collaboration: Allows code reviews, discussions, and documentation through issues, pull requests, and wiki.
• Integrations: Extensive integrations with various CI/CD tools, project management software, and third-party services.
• Security: Features such as vulnerability alerts, dependency graph, and secret scanning.
• Hosting: Both public and private repositories supported, with GitHub Pages for web hosting and GitHub Actions for automation.

​

Similarities to Bitbucket

• Both platforms provide Git-based version control and collaboration tools.
• Strong integration capabilities with CI/CD tools and services.
• Focus on security and providing a collaborative environment for development teams.

​

Differences and unique features

• Community size: GitHub boasts a larger developer community, offering more public repositories and unique collaborative opportunities.
• GitHub Actions: Built-in CI/CD tool that integrates seamlessly within the GitHub environment.
• Enterprise offerings: GitHub Enterprise offers robust features specifically aimed at large organizations looking for scalability and advanced control.

​

Alternative 2: GitLab

GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps lifecycle tool that encompasses everything from project planning and source code management to CI/CD and monitoring.

​

Key features

• Complete DevOps lifecycle: Manages projects from planning to monitoring, providing a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle.
• Version control: Git-based version control with robust branching and merging features.
• CI/CD integration: Built-in continuous integration and deployment pipelines.
• Security: Includes features like dependency scanning, container scanning, and DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing).
• Project management: Tools for issue tracking, milestones, and burndown charts.

​

Similarities to Bitbucket

• Both offer Git-based version control systems and strong collaborative features.
• Extensive integration capabilities with CI/CD tools and other third-party applications.
• Security features to keep codebases secure.

​

Differences and unique features

• Complete lifecycle tools: GitLab offers a single application for managing the entire DevOps lifecycle, minimizing the need for third-party tools.
• Custom CI/CD: Its CI/CD capabilities are built into the platform, offering deep integration and ease of setup.
• Self-hosting: While Bitbucket offers a cloud and server option, GitLab’s self-hosting capabilities are highly regarded with extensive customization options.

​

Alternative 3: Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps (formerly known as VSTS) is a set of development tools provided by Microsoft to support team collaboration in software development.

​

Key features

• Azure Repos: Git repositories for source control management.
• Azure Pipelines: Build and release services for supporting continuous integration and delivery.
• Azure Boards: Agile tools to support planning and tracking work, such as Kanban boards and backlogs.
• Azure Test Plans: A comprehensive suite of test management tools including exploratory testing and planned testing.
• Azure Artifacts: An integrated package management service that supports multiple package types.

​

Similarities to Bitbucket

• Both offer Git-based version control repositories.
• Strong emphasis on team collaboration and agile project management.
• Integrates well with CI/CD tools and other third-party applications.

​

Differences and unique features

• Microsoft ecosystem: Deep integration with other Microsoft tools and services, ideal for teams already using Microsoft products.
• Comprehensive toolset: Azure DevOps offers a broad array of tools covering the entire development lifecycle closely integrated within the Azure platform.
• Cloud focus: While Bitbucket allows for cloud and server options, Azure DevOps is deeply integrated with Azure cloud services, facilitating a seamless cloud environment.

​

Alternative 4: SourceForge

SourceForge is a web-based service that offers software developers a centralized online location to control and manage free and open-source software projects.

​

Key features

• Version control: Supports Git, Subversion (SVN), and Mercurial repositories.
• Project management: Includes a variety of tools for software project management, such as issue tracking, project categorization, and communication platforms.
• Software distribution: Allows developers to share and distribute their software.
• Community engagement: Provides a platform for discussing, reviewing, and collaborating on software projects.

​

Similarities to Bitbucket

• Both provide Git-based version control and collaborative features.
• Capabilities for issue tracking and project management.
• Focus on enabling better collaboration among software development teams.

​

Differences and unique features

• Focus on open-source projects: SourceForge has a strong emphasis on free and open-source software projects.
• Multiple repository types: In addition to Git, SourceForge supports Subversion (SVN) and Mercurial.
• Software distribution: Unlike Bitbucket, SourceForge has a significant focus on software distribution, enabling developers to share and distribute their software with the community.

​

Alternative 5: AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories.

​

Key features

• Fully managed: AWS CodeCommit handles all administrative tasks, ensuring high availability and durability without needing to manage your own infrastructure.
• Secure: Integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for robust security and access control.
• Scalable: Automatically scales to meet the needs of your project repository, no matter the size.
• Integrations: Seamlessly integrates with other AWS services and development tools like AWS CodePipeline for CI/CD.

​

Similarities to Bitbucket

• Both offer Git-based version control systems.
• Emphasis on security, making sure that codebases remain secure.
• Robust integration capabilities with other tools and services.

​

Differences and unique features

• AWS ecosystem: Offers deep integration with other AWS services, making it an ideal option for teams already using AWS.
• Fully managed service: Unlike Bitbucket’s cloud and server options, AWS CodeCommit is fully managed by AWS, which might ease administrative overhead.
• Scalability: Automatically scales to meet needs without additional configuration or infrastructure management.

​

Conclusion

When considering an alternative to Bitbucket, it's essential to evaluate what each platform brings to the table in terms of features, integrations, and workflow compatibility. GitHub offers a vast community and seamless action CI/CD, GitLab presents a one-stop DevOps lifecycle tool, Azure DevOps integrates deeply with Microsoft tools, SourceForge is ideal for open-source project distribution, and AWS CodeCommit provides a fully managed service with robust AWS integration. Each alternative has its unique strengths and may cater to specific team needs better than others.