Introduction

When it comes to selecting the right HRIS (Human Resource Information System) tool, businesses have numerous options to consider. Two popular choices are Lano and Rippling. 

​

Lano is a cloud-based compliance and payments platform. It provides a unified solution for hiring, managing, and paying employees and contractors in full compliance across over 150 countries worldwide, without the need to set up a legal entity.

​

Rippling, on the other hand, offers businesses a single platform to manage HR, IT, and Finance globally. It brings together all aspects of the workforce lifecycle, including payroll, expenses, benefits, and even computing resources, into one integrated system. This unprecedented level of integration helps streamline operations and enhances efficiency.

​

Choosing the right HRIS tool is critical for ensuring streamlined operations, compliance, and optimal employee management. This comparison aims to provide an in-depth look at both Lano and Rippling, highlighting their features, differences, pros, cons, and specific use cases to help you decide the best fit for your organization.

​

Lano Overview

Lano offers a robust platform designed to simplify and streamline global workforce management. 

​

Key Features

• Global Hiring: Easily hire employees and contractors compliantly in over 150 countries.
• Compliance Management: Ensure full compliance with local labor laws and tax regulations.
• Payments: Manage and process international payments seamlessly.
• Document Management: Store and manage employee and contractor documents.
• Comprehensive Onboarding: Streamlined onboarding process for both employees and contractors.
• Time and Expense Tracking: Track employee and contractor working hours and expenses.

​

Rippling Overview

Rippling is designed to be an all-in-one platform for managing the entire employee lifecycle, combining HR, IT, and finance functionalities.

​

Key Features

• Unified Employee Management: Handle everything from onboarding to offboarding in one place.
• Payroll Integration: Efficient payroll management, including automatic tax filings.
• IT Management: Manage devices, apps, and access permissions from a centralized system.
• Benefits Administration: Comprehensive benefits administration, including health, dental, and vision.
• Global Workforce Management: Support for international employees with localized compliance.
• Automation: Extensive automation capabilities for workflows and processes.

​

Similarities

Both Lano and Rippling are designed to support global workforce management, making them essential tools for companies with international operations. Here are some key similarities:

​

• Global Reach: Both platforms enable companies to manage employees and contractors worldwide.
• Compliance: Ensuring compliance with local labor laws and tax regulations is a core feature of both tools.
• Payroll Management: Both Lano and Rippling offer robust payroll solutions that handle international payments and compliance.
• Onboarding: Comprehensive onboarding processes to ensure a smooth start for new hires.
• Document Management: Secure storage and management of essential employee and contractor documents.
• Expense Tracking: Capabilities to track expenses, providing better financial oversight.

​

Differences

While Lano and Rippling share many similarities, they also have distinct differences that may make one more suitable for your needs than the other.

​

• Scope of Services: Lano focuses primarily on compliance, payments, and managing an international workforce, while Rippling offers a broader range of services, including IT management and comprehensive financial integrations.
• IT Management: Rippling provides extensive IT management capabilities, allowing businesses to manage employee devices, apps, and permissions, which is not a feature provided by Lano.
• Automation: Rippling has more advanced automation features, enabling businesses to automate numerous workflows and processes beyond HR, such as IT and finance.
• User Interface and Experience: Rippling is known for its modern and intuitive interface, which may provide a better user experience compared to Lano.
• Scalability: Rippling's extensive feature set and automation capabilities make it more scalable for larger organizations, whereas Lano is ideal for companies focusing on global compliance and payments.

​

Pros and Cons

Lano

Pros:

• Specialist in global hiring and payments.
• Strong compliance management for international operations.
• Easy-to-use interface for managing documents and payments.
• Comprehensive onboarding process for contractors and employees.

​

Cons:

• Limited IT and broader HR functionalities compared to Rippling.
• May require integration with other tools for a complete HRIS solution.
• User interface is functional but may not be as modern or intuitive as Rippling.

​

Rippling

Pros:

• Comprehensive solution covering HR, IT, and Finance.
• Advanced automation capabilities, reducing manual effort.
• Robust payroll and benefits administration.
• Excellent user experience with a modern interface.

​

Cons:

• Can be overwhelming for companies that only need basic HR functions.
• Higher learning curve due to the extensive feature set.
• May be more expensive compared to Lano, especially for smaller businesses.

​

Use Cases

Lano

Lano is best suited for companies that:

• Operate globally and need to hire employees and contractors in multiple countries.
• Require strong compliance management to navigate various local labor laws and tax regulations.
• Need a simplified solution for making international payments.
• Are looking for a straightforward tool to manage global workforce documentation and onboarding.

​

Rippling

Rippling is ideal for organizations that:

• Require an integrated solution for HR, IT, and finance management.
• Want to leverage automation to streamline workflows and reduce manual tasks.
• Need to manage employee devices, applications, and permissions in a centralized manner.
• Are rapidly growing and need a scalable platform with extensive features.

​

Conclusion

In summary, both Lano and Rippling offer powerful tools for managing your workforce, with features tailored to different organizational needs.

​

Lano excels in providing a straightforward, compliant, and efficient platform for global hiring, payments, and documentation management. It's particularly suitable for businesses with a strong focus on international operations and compliance.

​

Rippling, with its broader scope, is perfect for organizations seeking a comprehensive platform that covers HR, IT, and finance. Its advanced automation and integration capabilities provide a scalable solution for growing companies looking to streamline multiple aspects of their business.

​

Your choice between Lano and Rippling will depend on your specific needs. If your primary concern is managing a global workforce and ensuring compliance, Lano is the go-to solution. Conversely, if you require an all-in-one platform that offers extensive automation and IT management alongside HR functions, Rippling is the better choice.