Slite is a knowledge management and team collaboration tool designed to help distributed teams document, share, and organize their work.

With a clean, minimal interface and an emphasis on simplicity, Slite has become a go-to for startups and small businesses that want to keep their internal documentation lightweight and accessible. But while it delivers on ease of use, it may not check every box for larger organizations looking for more robust workflows and automation.

In this guide, we’ll explore how Slite stacks up—from its core features to the kinds of teams it's best suited for. We’ll also compare it to Guru, which brings a more AI-driven and enterprise-ready approach to knowledge sharing.

What is Slite?

Slite is a collaborative documentation platform launched in 2016 with remote-first teams in mind. Built by a small team headquartered in France, Slite’s mission is to help teams write and organize knowledge in one place—without the clutter of traditional wikis.

The tool has earned a solid reputation for its intuitive editor, Slack-style interface, and focus on keeping documentation clean and usable. While it doesn’t offer a sprawling feature set, its simplicity is part of its appeal. Teams often use it as a lightweight wiki, internal note-taking tool, or a central hub for meeting notes and project documentation.

Key features of Slite

Slite focuses on doing a few things well—namely writing, organizing, and collaborating on internal content. Here are some of the key features that define the platform:

• User-friendly editor: Slite’s editor is fast, clean, and distraction-free. Users can easily format content, embed media, and use keyboard shortcuts to keep their internal documentation flowing. It supports markdown-style formatting and basic media embedding like images and videos.
• Collections and folders: To keep knowledge organized, Slite uses a folder-based structure called “Collections.” These help teams categorize content by topic, department, or use case, making it easy to browse and search.
• Real-time collaboration: Teams can co-edit docs, leave comments, and mention teammates directly within a document. This makes it useful for async collaboration, especially for remote teams.
• Limited automation and integrations: While Slite does offer integrations with tools like Slack, GitHub, and Google Drive, it doesn’t have the depth or breadth of integrations offered by more mature knowledge platforms. It also lacks more advanced AI-driven features like verification workflows or automated content recommendations.
• Lightweight permissions: You can control access at the doc or folder level, but the permission settings are relatively basic compared to enterprise-ready platforms.

Who uses Slite

Slite is best suited for small to midsize remote teams—especially startups, tech companies, and agencies. Its lightweight design and ease of use make it ideal for teams that don’t have the time or resources to set up a more complex knowledge management system.

That said, larger organizations may find its feature set a bit too limited, especially if they need automated governance, advanced permissioning, or AI-powered search capabilities.

Pros and cons of Slite app

Like any tool, Slite has its strengths and trade-offs. Here’s a closer look at the pros and cons for teams considering it.

Pros:

• Integration with other tools: Slite integrates with Slack, Google Drive, and GitHub, allowing for some level of cross-platform usage.
• Collaboration features: Real-time editing, commenting, and mentions make it easy to collaborate across teams and time zones.
• Customization and scalability: It’s customizable enough for small teams, but may hit limitations as organizations grow and require more structure or automation.

Cons:

• Learning curve: While the editor is simple, some users mention a lack of intuitive workflows for setting up knowledge bases or FAQs.
• Cost: Slite offers a free plan, but its pricing can become steep for growing teams that need more storage or advanced features.
• Complexity: For users looking for structured knowledge governance or deep integrations, Slite may feel too lightweight. It lacks built-in workflows for verification, automated updates, or advanced permissions.

Guru vs. Slite

Both Guru and Slite aim to solve the knowledge-sharing problem, but they go about it in very different ways. Here’s how they stack up:

Guru’s strengths

Guru takes knowledge management a step further with AI-powered verification, advanced search, and powerful integrations. Unlike Slite, Guru offers:

• Enterprise-grade AI search: Guru connects to tools like Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Salesforce, and more to power cross-platform search and deliver AI-generated answers with source citations.
• Verification workflows: Keep content accurate with built-in verification systems and expert recommendations.
• Browser-based knowledge delivery: With the Guru browser extension, content surfaces contextually—right where your team is working, whether it’s Slack, Zendesk, or Salesforce.
• Custom AI agents: Guru’s Knowledge Agents deliver tailored search experiences for different teams, such as Sales or HR.
• Auto-translate, analytics, and content governance: With features like auto-archiving, duplicate detection, trust scores, and auto-translate into 100+ languages, Guru is built for global teams with high information standards.

Slite’s strengths

Slite offers a more minimal and distraction-free writing experience, which can appeal to smaller teams or startups that want a fast, lightweight way to create and share content. It’s easy to adopt and doesn’t require a lot of setup or training.

Integration and user experience

Guru is built to embed directly into your team's workflows, thanks to its robust integrations with Slack, Chrome, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce, Zendesk, and dozens of HRIS and project management platforms. Slite offers more limited integrations, which may be fine for smaller teams but could create friction for enterprise use.

In terms of user experience, Slite wins on simplicity, but Guru offers more depth—especially when it comes to managing knowledge at scale.

What customers are saying

Customer reviews shed light on the real-world experiences of teams using both platforms.

Slite users appreciate the tool’s affordability and ease of use, but mention limitations in formatting and searchability:

"Cheap to start, easy to understand and work with, nice emoji support, continuously improving software. Hard to copy/paste, not too much options for exporting/importing, formatting of code is just okay, no easy way to create things like FAQs or knowledge bases that are automatically updated, searchable and viewed by users of a specific team, etc."

Guru users, meanwhile, highlight the platform’s impact on team collaboration and efficiency:

“My overall experience with Guru has been very positive. The platform is intuitive and easy to use, making it simple for teams to create, organize, and share knowledge. The ability to integrate Guru with other tools we use has been a huge benefit, as it streamlines our workflows and keeps everything in one place. The collaborative features also help ensure that knowledge is continuously updated and accessible to everyone. While there are a few areas where customization could be improved, overall, Guru has been an invaluable tool for improving team efficiency and communication.”

Slite alternatives

If you’re considering Slite but want to explore other options, here are a few alternatives:

• Guru – Ideal for teams looking for verified knowledge, powerful search, and AI-driven automation.
• Notion – Offers more flexibility and customization, especially for cross-functional teams.
• Confluence – A more robust option for enterprise documentation with built-in Jira integration.
• Slab – Similar to Slite in style and usability, but with slightly more structured organization and permissions.
• Tettra – Built specifically for internal wikis and integrates tightly with Slack.

Conclusion: Choosing the right tool for your team

If your team is focused on simplicity and just needs a clean place to write and store internal docs, Slite might be the right fit. Its minimalist design and collaborative editor are great for small, remote teams that want to get up and running fast.

However, if your priority is easy access to trusted, verified knowledge with AI-driven assistance—and deep integration into your existing workflows—Guru is a better choice. With powerful enterprise search, customizable AI agents, and a suite of tools that ensure your knowledge stays accurate and accessible, Guru scales effortlessly as your team grows.

Ready to see how Guru can level up your team’s knowledge management? Check out our demo!

‍